A recent survey conducted by the ECU Center for Survey Research reveals that former Republican Senator Darline Graham holds a four-percentage-point lead over Democratic challenger Annie Andrews in South Carolina’s U.S. Senate race. Among likely voters, Graham garners 51% support compared to Andrews’s 47%, while 2% back an independent, minor-party, or write-in candidate. The poll, conducted October 19–24, has a credibility interval of ±3.7 percentage points, akin to a margin of error.
The findings underscore the centrality of economic issues in the contest: 54% of likely voters identify the economy, including the cost of living, as their top concern. Border security and immigration rank second at 14%. This emphasis on pocketbook matters suggests that candidates’ positions on inflation, jobs, and financial security will be pivotal in the final stretch of the campaign.
While Andrews leads among independents 53% to 43%, Graham’s overwhelming 93% to 6% advantage among Republicans provides her with a narrow overall edge. This dynamic highlights the importance of party loyalty and base turnout in a state where Republican identification remains strong. Graham’s ability to consolidate Republican support appears to offset Andrews’s appeal to independents, making the race competitive but favoring the GOP candidate.
The poll’s credibility interval of ±3.7 percentage points means the race could shift, but Graham’s lead is statistically meaningful. For voters and analysts, the results signal that the Senate contest remains closely watched, with implications for national party strategies. The survey was released in full via a click here announcement, which includes downloadable images and bios.
As the election approaches, the ECU poll offers a snapshot of a race defined by economic anxiety and partisan alignment. With Graham maintaining a slight advantage, both campaigns will likely intensify efforts to mobilize their bases and sway the small slice of undecided voters. The outcome could influence broader political narratives, particularly regarding the balance of power in the Senate and the effectiveness of messaging on cost-of-living issues.
